Conservation Northwest

Fall 2017 Conservation Northwest Newsletter

Conservation Northwest protects and connects old-growth forests and other wild areas from the Washington Coast to the British Columbia Rockies, vital to a healthy future for us, our children, and wildlife. Since 1989, Conservation Northwest has worke

Issue link: http://conservationnw.uberflip.com/i/893812

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 15

Coexisting with Wolves A gray wolf looking for a home can't do better than the state of Washington. at statement might surprise people, as Washington has made headlines for killing wolves, most recent- ly on Sept. 1 as well as earlier in the summer, when two wolves from the Smackout pack were killed following livestock attacks. To some, the names of the Wedge, Huckleberry, Profanity and now Smackout and Sherman wolf packs are a requiem, symbols of pain and a controversial policy. But when you dig deeper, wolf recovery in Washington is a success story worth repeating. Our state's first pack was documented in 2008, and 20 packs have since been officially confirmed—and that's a low - ball number. Given at least 120 wolves and a growth rate great- er than 25 percent annually, the range of wolves in the state is spreading west and south from its original concentration in the northeast counties. Because wolves are prolific breeders and able to adapt to a range of habitats, they do fine, so long as they're not poisoned, trapped or profusely shot. e key to a future for wolves is retaining public support by minimizing conflict. at means finding ways for wolves and ranchers to coexist. Washington has forged a model for building coexistence based on bringing stakeholders together through respect, dialogue and a search for common ground. is year, nearly 100 Washington ranchers and farmers signed agreements to employ deterrence measures, from range riding to guard dogs, to prevent or reduce conflicts with wolves. While some con - servation groups cling to the idea that firing off press releases and lawsuits will win the day for wolves, the progress in Wash- ington demonstrates that cooperation and compromise offer a better path to the long-term future of wolves. is transformation through collaboration does more than protect wolves; it shows respect for rural communities. It dem - onstrates that cooperation rather than culture war can lead to practical solutions in some of the reddest counties in the West. Not that collaboration and deterrence methods always A wolf pack walks a ridgeline in Yellowstone National Park. We've never been afraid to sit at the table with those who are different than us, even when common ground seems elusive. Wolves need this, and so does our country. Photo: Milehightraveler succeed. Since 2012, Washington has had five conflicts bad enough that wolves have had to be killed. Yes, I, a wolf-loving lifelong conservationist, think that wolves sometimes have to be killed. anks to a well-facilitated Wolf Advisory Group com - posed of a wide range of stake-holding interests, we have a clear policy on that in our state. Importantly, the certainty this agreement provides gives those living and working in wolf country incentive to participate without fear of the goalposts being constantly moved. Accepting lethal removal of wolves as a last resort is a sad but integral part of coexistence. Gov - ernment action is essential in the infrequent instances where livestock depredations have become chronic. e alternative approach is seen in Montana, Idaho and es- pecially Wyoming, where more than 20 percent of the popu- lation—literally hundreds of wolves—is killed annually. You don't hear about these deaths because they're so common. In Washington, wolf kills are rare enough that some activists name each dead animal. Yet Washington's success story seldom makes the headlines. Some have pigg y-backed on the whole wolf controversy to raise other issues, such as whether livestock even belongs on public land. But if good wolf policy had to wait until Con - gress resolved the debate over public-lands grazing, few packs would be safe. And while publicizing the deaths of wolves is good for headlines and fundraising, the resulting polarization leaves wolves even more vulnerable to rural anger, poaching and legislative repercussions. Here in Washington, key conservation groups, ranchers, hunters and other interests have enough integrity to stand to - gether and oversee the implementation of policies they helped cra. at's something special in today's divided West. e return of the wolf is just one of many budding wild- life success stories in the American West today. But without buy-in from the people who live with and around wolves, that success remains tenuous. Reasonable compromise on all sides Collaboration: Best way for coexistence COEXISTING WITH WOLVES Mitch Friedman Executive Director, mitch@conservationnw.org Continued, top of next page 4 Fall 2017 conservationnw.org

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Conservation Northwest - Fall 2017 Conservation Northwest Newsletter