Conservation Northwest

2017 Citizen Wildlife Monitoring Project Report_FINAL_WithAppendices

Conservation Northwest protects and connects old-growth forests and other wild areas from the Washington Coast to the British Columbia Rockies, vital to a healthy future for us, our children, and wildlife. Since 1989, Conservation Northwest has worke

Issue link: http://conservationnw.uberflip.com/i/948993

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 23 of 120

24 Table 8. Wolverine survey area information, including duration of monitoring and number of installations. + Denotes a survey area without a run-pole installed. ^Denotes the first date photos were received in 2017 from survey areas left active over the winter. *Denotes the last date cameras were checked, but survey area was not uninstalled. ~Cameras active over multiple years, data received in 2017. Wolverine Camera Survey Areas 2017 Survey Area General Region # of Installations Installation Date Removal Date Total Trap Nights Lure Chiwaukum OWNF 2 2016/12/04^ 2017/09/10* 560 Gusto / Bait Chiwawa OWNF 2 2016/11/24^ 2017/9/07 574 Gusto / Bait Hannegan Pass+ NCNP 2 2017/08/26 2017/10/29* 64 Gusto / Bait Ice Lakes~ OWNF 1 2015/06/19 2017/07/23* 765 Gusto / Bait Kendall Peak+ MBSNF 1 2017/01/11^ 2017/08/15* 145 Gusto / Bait Lake Ethel OWNF 1 2017/06/03 2017/10/18* 137 Gusto / Bait Lookout Mountain MBSNF 1 2016/10/29^ 2017/10/28* 364 Gusto / Bait Mountaineer Creek (Multi-St) OWNF 1 2016/11/25^ 2017/02/25 92 Gusto / Bait Summer Blossom Ridge~ OWNF 1 2015/06/28 2017/09/25 820 Gusto / Bait Table Mountain MBSNF 2 2017/07/30 2017/10/15* 154 Gusto / Bait Union Gap OWNF 1 2016/11/19^ 2017/10/14* 329 Gusto / Bait As previously described, wolverine survey areas are different from our other survey areas because they typically consist of two cameras at each installation. The vicinity camera captures detections within the general area and the run-pole camera photographs animals head-on, on the run-pole. For run-poles that have been elevated to accommodate for winter snowpack, the height differential between ground level and run-pole can sometimes be over 10 feet. Since two cameras are running simultaneously, duplicate events are deleted prior to updating our database to obtain a more accurate understanding of detection rate and species detected, without doubling detection events. Two survey areas did not have run-poles established; Hannegan Pass and Kendall Peaks had one camera each. The Ice Lakes and Summer Blossom Ridge cameras were installed in 2015 and data was collected in July and September, respectively, with both cameras still operational and detecting species presence. Our cameras detected wolverines at Ice Lakes and a fisher at Lookout Mountain, both level one species. The Ice Lakes camera, which has detected wolverines in past years, was active from June of 2015 to July of 2017 and recorded eight separate detections, one with two individual wolverines passing through the site together. The wolverine detections at Ice Lakes spanned over four days in August 2016, in September a month later, again in December of 2016, and two visits eleven days apart in July of 2017. Because the site had not been rebaited in some time, the desired behavior needed to obtain photographs of an individual's unique chest blaze pattern or the act of rubbing on a hair snag for genetic samples were not achieved. The small sample size of cells related to non-invasive genetic sampling (hair samples compared to blood or tissue) and the degradation of genetic samples from the elements, means that hair samples must be collected on frequent intervals to obtain a quality sample and put in desiccant to dry and preserve the sample from

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Conservation Northwest - 2017 Citizen Wildlife Monitoring Project Report_FINAL_WithAppendices