Conservation Northwest

2017 Citizen Wildlife Monitoring Project Report_FINAL_WithAppendices

Conservation Northwest protects and connects old-growth forests and other wild areas from the Washington Coast to the British Columbia Rockies, vital to a healthy future for us, our children, and wildlife. Since 1989, Conservation Northwest has worke

Issue link: http://conservationnw.uberflip.com/i/948993

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 74 of 120

75 Reliability. Reliability is largely a product of effective and representative sampling, but there are additional properties that a reliable survey protocol should have. It should be reliable in the sense that if applied, it will produce interpretable results. At the finest scale (traditionally the scent station but, in our design, the transect) if a lynx is present in the area, the probability of detection should be as constant as possible. This allows the proportion of occurrences to infer use. At a larger scale, we want to reliably state that, given a certain level of effort, we will have detections if lynx are present, and therefore a lack of detections indicates a lack of lynx. At the fine scale, placing scent stations 100 m apart and perpendicular to the major slope produces a structure that will be encountered by lynx moving through the country and removes small-scale differences associated with station placement. At a broader scale, the protocol requires placing no fewer than 25 transects at a density of 1 transect per every 2 miles for a period of 2-4 weeks to ensure that an area is adequately sampled. Details Broad decisions concerning where to sample Decisions as to where to sample are based primarily on the interest of the managers. If grids (25+ transects) were placed randomly within a major cover type, the grids themselves would be a representative sample of the cover type. A manager may, however, need information about lynx in a specific area, and can place grids preferentially. In broken habitat, such as forested areas separated by low elevation prairie, dry forest types or deciduous forests not thought to be lynx habitat, or lands which have been converted to agriculture, the sampling does not need to conform to a rectangular grid. All that is required is that the placement within the lynx habitat be at a density of about 1 transect per every 2 miles. An easy way to accomplish this is to put a large 2x2 mile grid across the landscape and use only those points which fall into habitat as the sample. In all cases the grid should start at a random location. Do not move the grid to get the highest number of points in habitat. One approach that may work well is simply to use section boundaries as the grid. If these boundaries are not associated with vegetation changes, then they can be thought of as random. If, however, there are specific features that are generally associated with section boundaries, such as changes in forest age associated with "checkerboard" ownership patterns in the West, then section boundaries will not work, and you will need to start the grid at a random location. As was mentioned above, managers can decide where to sample, but our recommendations are generally to sample in cover types and areas which there is some evidence of historical lynx occurrence. Maps of broad cover-types associated with historic lynx occurrence are available for the contiguous US. These

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of Conservation Northwest - 2017 Citizen Wildlife Monitoring Project Report_FINAL_WithAppendices